Use case · AI bug triage

AI bug triage that ends in a fix, not a label.

Most bug triage stops at a sorted ticket. RunGuard triages your production errors — grouping duplicates, classifying them, and surfacing what’s actually hurting — then routes each survivor to the coding agent your team already pays for, as a scoped GitHub issue.
Live · GitHub CopilotLive · Claude Code ActionTypeScript + Python SDKs

In short

AI bug triage is the automatic classification, grouping, prioritization, and routing of incoming bugs so the most important ones get worked on first — without a person sorting every report by hand. RunGuard applies it to production errors: it dedupes by signature, classifies the error, surfaces the high-frequency incidents, and routes each one to your own coding agent as a scoped GitHub issue.
RG-FLOWHow RunGuard triagesSix stations, zero manual sorting

From a flood of errors to one routable incident.

Triage isn’t a label — it’s the work of turning noisy signals into a single, scoped, context-rich task.
  1. 01

    Capture

    The SDK (TypeScript or Python) or a plain POST /ingest sends each production exception with its stack trace and request metadata the moment it happens.

  2. 02

    Group & dedupe

    Errors are collapsed by signature, so a bug that fires 10,000 times becomes one incident — not 10,000 tickets to wade through.

  3. 03

    Classify

    Each group is classified by error type, so similar failures cluster and the shape of the problem is obvious at a glance.

  4. 04

    Surface what matters

    Frequency and first/last-seen are tracked on every group, so the loudest and freshest incidents stand out — no manual severity-sorting.

  5. 05

    Apply policy

    Ignore patterns, protected paths, and your plan quota are evaluated before anything leaves RunGuard, so noise and out-of-scope errors never become work.

  6. 06

    Route to a fix

    The survivor is routed to your chosen coding agent as a scoped GitHub issue with a crash packet — or held for review if you want a human in the loop.

RG-VSWhy automate triage

Manual triage versus triage on rails.

The cost of manual triage isn’t the sorting — it’s the duplicates, the inconsistency, and the time an incident sits untouched.
RunGuardManual bug triage
First touchAutomatic, the moment the error firesWhen a human next checks the dashboard
Duplicate errorsCollapsed by signature into one incidentRe-read and re-sorted every time
Context attachedCrash packet: stack, suspected file, frequencyWhatever the reporter happened to write
Outcome of triageA scoped GitHub issue routed to an agentA labeled ticket waiting for someone
ConsistencyThe same policy runs on every errorVaries by who is on triage that day
RG-NEXTTriage is the start, not the end

Where the triaged incident goes next.

A triaged incident is only useful if it leads somewhere. RunGuard hands it to a coding agent you own, or to a human.
RG-FAQQuestions

Plain answers about AI bug triage.

What is AI bug triage?

AI bug triage is the automatic classification, grouping, prioritization, and routing of incoming bugs so the most important ones get worked on first — without a person sorting every report by hand. RunGuard applies it to production errors: it dedupes by signature, classifies the error, surfaces the high-frequency incidents, and routes each one to your own coding agent as a scoped GitHub issue.

Does AI bug triage replace developers?

No. It removes the sorting toil — reading duplicate alerts, guessing severity, deciding who owns what — and hands a developer (or their coding agent) a single, context-rich, scoped task instead. The judgment and the fix still belong to your team.

How does RunGuard decide which errors matter?

It tracks frequency and first/last-seen on every error group and classifies by type, so the incidents firing most and most recently stand out. There is no opaque severity model guessing for you — the signals are concrete and visible on the dashboard.

Does RunGuard fix the bug, or just triage it?

RunGuard triages and routes. The actual code change comes from a coding agent you own — GitHub Copilot or Claude Code Action — running on your own seat or API key. Triage ends in an agent-ready GitHub issue, not a dead-end ticket.

Won’t automated triage just create noise?

No. Deduplication means one bug is one incident no matter how often it fires, and ignore patterns plus protected paths filter out-of-scope errors before they ever become an issue. Recurring errors update the existing issue instead of opening new ones.

How is this different from triage inside Sentry, Jira, or Linear?

Those triage tickets and reports that already live in a tracker. RunGuard triages raw production errors and ends in an agent-ready GitHub issue with a fix path — it is the step that turns an alert into scoped, routable work, not another inbox to sort.

Stop sorting. Start routing.

Connect a repo, drop in the SDK, and let the next production error triage itself into a scoped GitHub issue.